[DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
38 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

piotrz
Hi Folks,

Please discuss here any related issue to release candidate 2.

Thanks,
--

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Maxim Solodovnik
Both previously broken files are OK :)
*nix scripts has executable bit set :)

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Hi Folks,
>
> Please discuss here any related issue to release candidate 2.
>
> Thanks,
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>



--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

piotrz
Hi Maxim,

Thank you for checking! :)

Piotr

2017-11-15 15:26 GMT+01:00 Maxim Solodovnik <[hidden email]>:

> Both previously broken files are OK :)
> *nix scripts has executable bit set :)
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <[hidden email]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > Please discuss here any related issue to release candidate 2.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>



--

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Peter Ent-2
Hi Piotr,

Looks like a similar issue is happening to the royale-asjs executables.
What did you do to fix this for the release?

Thanks,
‹peter

On 11/15/17, 9:28 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>Hi Maxim,
>
>Thank you for checking! :)
>
>Piotr
>
>2017-11-15 15:26 GMT+01:00 Maxim Solodovnik <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Both previously broken files are OK :)
>> *nix scripts has executable bit set :)
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>><[hidden email]
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Folks,
>> >
>> > Please discuss here any related issue to release candidate 2.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > --
>> >
>> > Piotr Zarzycki
>> >
>> > Patreon:
>>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc4a8b32ee9644933a2af08d52c3535
>>8d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463529410104318&sdata=
>>kfTprTFFkle5yXSWdCRH0yEPd4hZfsI1%2FbI5SFor9IA%3D&reserved=0
>> >
>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc4a8b32ee9644933a2af08d52c3535
>>8d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463529410104318&sdata=
>>kfTprTFFkle5yXSWdCRH0yEPd4hZfsI1%2FbI5SFor9IA%3D&reserved=0>*
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
>
>
>--
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>Patreon:
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc4a8b32ee9644933a2af08d52c35358d
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463529410104318&sdata=kfT
>prTFFkle5yXSWdCRH0yEPd4hZfsI1%2FbI5SFor9IA%3D&reserved=0
><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc4a8b32ee9644933a2af08d52c35358d
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463529410104318&sdata=kfT
>prTFFkle5yXSWdCRH0yEPd4hZfsI1%2FbI5SFor9IA%3D&reserved=0>*

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

piotrz
Hi Peter,

I have setup environment variable JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS to -Dfile.encoding=UTF8.
I haven't fix any executable issue. Alex mention that there is script in
FlexJS build.xml which changing files with those who have exe extensions,
but I didn't have time to implement those.

Piotr


2017-11-16 18:02 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent <[hidden email]>:

> Hi Piotr,
>
> Looks like a similar issue is happening to the royale-asjs executables.
> What did you do to fix this for the release?
>
> Thanks,
> ‹peter
>
> On 11/15/17, 9:28 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> >Hi Maxim,
> >
> >Thank you for checking! :)
> >
> >Piotr
> >
> >2017-11-15 15:26 GMT+01:00 Maxim Solodovnik <[hidden email]>:
> >
> >> Both previously broken files are OK :)
> >> *nix scripts has executable bit set :)
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
> >><[hidden email]
> >> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Folks,
> >> >
> >> > Please discuss here any related issue to release candidate 2.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >> >
> >> > Patreon:
> >>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc4a8b32ee9644933a2af08d52c35
> 35
> >>8d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636463529410104318&sdata=
> >>kfTprTFFkle5yXSWdCRH0yEPd4hZfsI1%2FbI5SFor9IA%3D&reserved=0
> >> >
> >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc4a8b32ee9644933a2af08d52c35
> 35
> >>8d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636463529410104318&sdata=
> >>kfTprTFFkle5yXSWdCRH0yEPd4hZfsI1%2FbI5SFor9IA%3D&reserved=0>*
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> WBR
> >> Maxim aka solomax
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> >Patreon:
> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc4a8b32ee9644933a2af08d52c35
> 358d
> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636463529410104318&sdata=kfT
> >prTFFkle5yXSWdCRH0yEPd4hZfsI1%2FbI5SFor9IA%3D&reserved=0
> ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc4a8b32ee9644933a2af08d52c35
> 358d
> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636463529410104318&sdata=kfT
> >prTFFkle5yXSWdCRH0yEPd4hZfsI1%2FbI5SFor9IA%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>


--

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

piotrz
Alex,

Could you please add to jira version 4.16.1 for Flex SDK ?

Thanks, Piotr


2017-11-16 18:12 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <[hidden email]>:

> Hi Peter,
>
> I have setup environment variable JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS to -Dfile.encoding=UTF8.
> I haven't fix any executable issue. Alex mention that there is script in
> FlexJS build.xml which changing files with those who have exe extensions,
> but I didn't have time to implement those.
>
> Piotr
>
>
> 2017-11-16 18:02 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Hi Piotr,
>>
>> Looks like a similar issue is happening to the royale-asjs executables.
>> What did you do to fix this for the release?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ‹peter
>>
>> On 11/15/17, 9:28 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Maxim,
>> >
>> >Thank you for checking! :)
>> >
>> >Piotr
>> >
>> >2017-11-15 15:26 GMT+01:00 Maxim Solodovnik <[hidden email]>:
>> >
>> >> Both previously broken files are OK :)
>> >> *nix scripts has executable bit set :)
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>> >><[hidden email]
>> >> >
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi Folks,
>> >> >
>> >> > Please discuss here any related issue to release candidate 2.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > --
>> >> >
>> >> > Piotr Zarzycki
>> >> >
>> >> > Patreon:
>> >>*<a href="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%">https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%
>> 3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc4a8b32ee964493
>> 3a2af08d52c3535
>> >>8d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364635294
>> 10104318&sdata=
>> >>kfTprTFFkle5yXSWdCRH0yEPd4hZfsI1%2FbI5SFor9IA%3D&reserved=0
>> >> >
>> >><<a href="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%">https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%
>> 3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc4a8b32ee964493
>> 3a2af08d52c3535
>> >>8d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364635294
>> 10104318&sdata=
>> >>kfTprTFFkle5yXSWdCRH0yEPd4hZfsI1%2FbI5SFor9IA%3D&reserved=0>*
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> WBR
>> >> Maxim aka solomax
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >
>> >Piotr Zarzycki
>> >
>> >Patreon:
>> >*<a href="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%">https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%
>> 3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc4a8b32ee9644933a
>> 2af08d52c35358d
>> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364635294101
>> 04318&sdata=kfT
>> >prTFFkle5yXSWdCRH0yEPd4hZfsI1%2FbI5SFor9IA%3D&reserved=0
>> ><<a href="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%">https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%
>> 3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc4a8b32ee9644933a
>> 2af08d52c35358d
>> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364635294101
>> 04318&sdata=kfT
>> >prTFFkle5yXSWdCRH0yEPd4hZfsI1%2FbI5SFor9IA%3D&reserved=0>*
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>



--

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Alex Harui-2
Done.  Added Installer 3.4 as well.

On 11/19/17, 5:06 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>Alex,
>
>Could you please add to jira version 4.16.1 for Flex SDK ?
>
>Thanks, Piotr
>
>
>2017-11-16 18:12 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> I have setup environment variable JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS to
>>-Dfile.encoding=UTF8.
>> I haven't fix any executable issue. Alex mention that there is script in
>> FlexJS build.xml which changing files with those who have exe
>>extensions,
>> but I didn't have time to implement those.
>>
>> Piotr
>>
>>
>> 2017-11-16 18:02 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>> Hi Piotr,
>>>
>>> Looks like a similar issue is happening to the royale-asjs executables.
>>> What did you do to fix this for the release?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> ‹peter
>>>
>>> On 11/15/17, 9:28 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[hidden email]>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>> >Hi Maxim,
>>> >
>>> >Thank you for checking! :)
>>> >
>>> >Piotr
>>> >
>>> >2017-11-15 15:26 GMT+01:00 Maxim Solodovnik <[hidden email]>:
>>> >
>>> >> Both previously broken files are OK :)
>>> >> *nix scripts has executable bit set :)
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>>> >><[hidden email]
>>> >> >
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Hi Folks,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Please discuss here any related issue to release candidate 2.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Thanks,
>>> >> > --
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Piotr Zarzycki
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Patreon:
>>> >>*<a href="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%">https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%
>>> 3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc4a8b32ee964493
>>> 3a2af08d52c3535
>>> >>8d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364635294
>>> 10104318&sdata=
>>> >>kfTprTFFkle5yXSWdCRH0yEPd4hZfsI1%2FbI5SFor9IA%3D&reserved=0
>>> >> >
>>> >><<a href="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%">https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%
>>> 3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>>> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc4a8b32ee964493
>>> 3a2af08d52c3535
>>> >>8d%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364635294
>>> 10104318&sdata=
>>> >>kfTprTFFkle5yXSWdCRH0yEPd4hZfsI1%2FbI5SFor9IA%3D&reserved=0>*
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> WBR
>>> >> Maxim aka solomax
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >--
>>> >
>>> >Piotr Zarzycki
>>> >
>>> >Patreon:
>>> >*<a href="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%">https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%
>>> 3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc4a8b32ee9644933a
>>> 2af08d52c35358d
>>> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364635294101
>>> 04318&sdata=kfT
>>> >prTFFkle5yXSWdCRH0yEPd4hZfsI1%2FbI5SFor9IA%3D&reserved=0
>>> ><<a href="https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%">https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%
>>> 3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cc4a8b32ee9644933a
>>> 2af08d52c35358d
>>> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364635294101
>>> 04318&sdata=kfT
>>> >prTFFkle5yXSWdCRH0yEPd4hZfsI1%2FbI5SFor9IA%3D&reserved=0>*
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon:
>>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cee4500c704214dc8cc8208d52f4e58
>>0c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636466935884367583&sdata=
>>8DANOWQGQTRhGCWoVcWtm9imsv8%2Bos9qwg76OUcX9Rw%3D&reserved=0
>>
>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cee4500c704214dc8cc8208d52f4e58
>>0c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636466935884367583&sdata=
>>8DANOWQGQTRhGCWoVcWtm9imsv8%2Bos9qwg76OUcX9Rw%3D&reserved=0>*
>>
>
>
>
>--
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>Patreon:
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cee4500c704214dc8cc8208d52f4e580c
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636466935884367583&sdata=8DA
>NOWQGQTRhGCWoVcWtm9imsv8%2Bos9qwg76OUcX9Rw%3D&reserved=0
><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cee4500c704214dc8cc8208d52f4e580c
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636466935884367583&sdata=8DA
>NOWQGQTRhGCWoVcWtm9imsv8%2Bos9qwg76OUcX9Rw%3D&reserved=0>*

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Peter Ent-2
In reply to this post by piotrz
The osmf download still fails for me. I tried Java 1.8 and Java 1.7 since
someone in an email thread said that seemed to be the issue.

I am going on vacation for the US Thanksgiving holiday and will be back
next week.
Regards,
Peter

On 11/15/17, 4:16 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>Hi Folks,
>
>Please discuss here any related issue to release candidate 2.
>
>Thanks,
>--
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>Patreon:
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c099968
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
>sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0
><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c099968
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
>sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0>*

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

piotrz
Hi Peter,

Too bad! I will take a look into that. It seems that this release is going
to take much longer.
I'm wondering why Alex didn't have such problems...

Happy Thanksgiving!
Piotr


2017-11-20 19:41 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent <[hidden email]>:

> The osmf download still fails for me. I tried Java 1.8 and Java 1.7 since
> someone in an email thread said that seemed to be the issue.
>
> I am going on vacation for the US Thanksgiving holiday and will be back
> next week.
> Regards,
> Peter
>
> On 11/15/17, 4:16 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> >Hi Folks,
> >
> >Please discuss here any related issue to release candidate 2.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >--
> >
> >Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> >Patreon:
> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c09
> 9968
> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
> >sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0
> ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c09
> 9968
> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
> >sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>


--

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Alex Harui-2
Peter and others, if you are going to test this release, you will probably
need the JCE upgrade.  Piotr already mentioned it in the RC1 discussion.

Java 8:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jce8-download-21331
66.html
Java 7:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jce-7-download-4321
24.html

There was some internet posts that Java 1.8.0_101 had the JCE upgrade
built in, but that seems to no longer be the case.  I had to apply the
upgrade to get OSMF to download properly.

-Alex


On 11/20/17, 10:45 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>Hi Peter,
>
>Too bad! I will take a look into that. It seems that this release is going
>to take much longer.
>I'm wondering why Alex didn't have such problems...
>
>Happy Thanksgiving!
>Piotr
>
>
>2017-11-20 19:41 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent <[hidden email]>:
>
>> The osmf download still fails for me. I tried Java 1.8 and Java 1.7
>>since
>> someone in an email thread said that seemed to be the issue.
>>
>> I am going on vacation for the US Thanksgiving holiday and will be back
>> next week.
>> Regards,
>> Peter
>>
>> On 11/15/17, 4:16 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[hidden email]>
>>wrote:
>>
>> >Hi Folks,
>> >
>> >Please discuss here any related issue to release candidate 2.
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >--
>> >
>> >Piotr Zarzycki
>> >
>> >Patreon:
>> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c09
>> 9968
>> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
>> >sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0
>> ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c09
>> 9968
>> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
>> >sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0>*
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>Patreon:
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4fe8688ba0c249441f7f08d53046e13e
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468003336775690&sdata=mLX
>UE13WLtjdWWUxKL3kfbNxQH1%2B5id4FiTyW7wYhOU%3D&reserved=0
><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4fe8688ba0c249441f7f08d53046e13e
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468003336775690&sdata=mLX
>UE13WLtjdWWUxKL3kfbNxQH1%2B5id4FiTyW7wYhOU%3D&reserved=0>*

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

piotrz
I did exactly what Alex saying and it resolve my problems. I just thought
right now that it may be something else in Peter's case.

Let's wait to his info having your email.

Thanks, Piotr

2017-11-20 19:54 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <[hidden email]>:

> Peter and others, if you are going to test this release, you will probably
> need the JCE upgrade.  Piotr already mentioned it in the RC1 discussion.
>
> Java 8:
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/
> downloads/jce8-download-21331
> 66.html
> Java 7:
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/
> downloads/jce-7-download-4321
> 24.html
>
> There was some internet posts that Java 1.8.0_101 had the JCE upgrade
> built in, but that seems to no longer be the case.  I had to apply the
> upgrade to get OSMF to download properly.
>
> -Alex
>
>
> On 11/20/17, 10:45 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> >Hi Peter,
> >
> >Too bad! I will take a look into that. It seems that this release is going
> >to take much longer.
> >I'm wondering why Alex didn't have such problems...
> >
> >Happy Thanksgiving!
> >Piotr
> >
> >
> >2017-11-20 19:41 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent <[hidden email]>:
> >
> >> The osmf download still fails for me. I tried Java 1.8 and Java 1.7
> >>since
> >> someone in an email thread said that seemed to be the issue.
> >>
> >> I am going on vacation for the US Thanksgiving holiday and will be back
> >> next week.
> >> Regards,
> >> Peter
> >>
> >> On 11/15/17, 4:16 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[hidden email]>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi Folks,
> >> >
> >> >Please discuss here any related issue to release candidate 2.
> >> >
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >--
> >> >
> >> >Piotr Zarzycki
> >> >
> >> >Patreon:
> >> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c09
> >> 9968
> >> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
> >> >sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0
> >> ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c09
> >> 9968
> >> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
> >> >sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0>*
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> >Patreon:
> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4fe8688ba0c249441f7f08d53046
> e13e
> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636468003336775690&sdata=mLX
> >UE13WLtjdWWUxKL3kfbNxQH1%2B5id4FiTyW7wYhOU%3D&reserved=0
> ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4fe8688ba0c249441f7f08d53046
> e13e
> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636468003336775690&sdata=mLX
> >UE13WLtjdWWUxKL3kfbNxQH1%2B5id4FiTyW7wYhOU%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>


--

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Peter Ent-2
In reply to this post by Alex Harui-2
That was the problem. I guess I forgot to install that; lots of parts to
get Apache Royale going, that's for sure.

‹peter

On 11/20/17, 1:54 PM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>Peter and others, if you are going to test this release, you will probably
>need the JCE upgrade.  Piotr already mentioned it in the RC1 discussion.
>
>Java 8:
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.oracle
>.com%2Ftechnetwork%2Fjava%2Fjavase%2Fdownloads%2Fjce8-download-21331&data=
>02%7C01%7C%7Cb634ed95d2194df0f14908d530481daf%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178
>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468008649778290&sdata=psFORwac70PRCy616onb1dwvMxsiJ1cx
>QAPSUmk0ucI%3D&reserved=0
>66.html
>Java 7:
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.oracle
>.com%2Ftechnetwork%2Fjava%2Fjavase%2Fdownloads%2Fjce-7-download-4321&data=
>02%7C01%7C%7Cb634ed95d2194df0f14908d530481daf%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178
>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468008649778290&sdata=L%2F6K3EOBVbicEkpZYrqu803RUrjbSB
>l174bCcQX0OdA%3D&reserved=0
>24.html
>
>There was some internet posts that Java 1.8.0_101 had the JCE upgrade
>built in, but that seems to no longer be the case.  I had to apply the
>upgrade to get OSMF to download properly.
>
>-Alex
>
>
>On 11/20/17, 10:45 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>Hi Peter,
>>
>>Too bad! I will take a look into that. It seems that this release is
>>going
>>to take much longer.
>>I'm wondering why Alex didn't have such problems...
>>
>>Happy Thanksgiving!
>>Piotr
>>
>>
>>2017-11-20 19:41 GMT+01:00 Peter Ent <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>> The osmf download still fails for me. I tried Java 1.8 and Java 1.7
>>>since
>>> someone in an email thread said that seemed to be the issue.
>>>
>>> I am going on vacation for the US Thanksgiving holiday and will be back
>>> next week.
>>> Regards,
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> On 11/15/17, 4:16 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[hidden email]>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>> >Hi Folks,
>>> >
>>> >Please discuss here any related issue to release candidate 2.
>>> >
>>> >Thanks,
>>> >--
>>> >
>>> >Piotr Zarzycki
>>> >
>>> >Patreon:
>>> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c09
>>> 9968
>>> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>> 7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
>>> >sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0
>>> ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>>> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>>> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cd5ebdc74850744840d2908d52c09
>>> 9968
>>> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>>> 7C636463342107239711&sdata=gie
>>> >sBlVrgOERza%2FjiN8xMU8E1Rw59ztQcsrc8ZtMJ38%3D&reserved=0>*
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>
>>Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>>Patreon:
>>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>>r
>>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4fe8688ba0c249441f7f08d53046e13
>>e
>>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468003336775690&sdata=mL
>>X
>>UE13WLtjdWWUxKL3kfbNxQH1%2B5id4FiTyW7wYhOU%3D&reserved=0
>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>>r
>>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C4fe8688ba0c249441f7f08d53046e13
>>e
>>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468003336775690&sdata=mL
>>X
>>UE13WLtjdWWUxKL3kfbNxQH1%2B5id4FiTyW7wYhOU%3D&reserved=0>*
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Justin Mclean
Administrator
Hi,

Looks like we may still have some unicode issues. Some that are likely to cause issues:

Comparing  the source release to a clean checked out repo:

file apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/licenseParts/saxon9-NOTICES/UNICODE.txt
apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/licenseParts/saxon9-NOTICES/UNICODE.txt: ISO-8859 text, with CRLF line terminators

That that probably not a an issue but is is likely to cause locale issues:
diff -w -r apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/apache/bundles/fr_FR/apache.properties /Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/apache/bundles/fr_FR/apache.properties
21c21
< invalidCharPostcodeError=Le code postal contient des caract�res invalides.
---
> invalidCharPostcodeError=Le code postal contient des caract<E8>res invalides.

diff -w -r apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties /Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
39c39
< currencySymbol=�
---
> currencySymbol=<A3>

diff -w -r apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/modules/debugger/src/java/flex/tools/debugger/cli/fdbhelp_fi.txt /Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/modules/debugger/src/java/flex/tools/debugger/cli/fdbhelp_fi.txt

< M��ritt�m�t�n komento. Sy�tt�m�ll� 'help' n�et luettelon kaikista
---
> M<E4><E4>ritt<E4>m<E4>t<F6>n komento. Sy<F6>tt<E4>m<E4>ll<E4> 'help' n<E4>et luettelon kaikista

Thanks,
Justin



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Justin Mclean
Administrator
Hi,

> diff -w -r apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties /Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
> 39c39
> < currencySymbol=�
> ---
>> currencySymbol=<A3>

Just confirmed this is an issue and here's some example code to test it. To test compile with the en_GB locale.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<mx:Application xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml" layout="absolute"  applicationComplete="format()">
        <mx:Script>
                <![CDATA[
                        import mx.formatters.CurrencyFormatter;
                       
                        public function format():void{
                                ti.text = formatter.format(ti.text).toString();
                        }
                ]]>
        </mx:Script>
        <mx:CurrencyFormatter id="formatter" />
        <mx:TextInput id="ti" text="100" change="format()" />
</mx:Application>

The currency symbol will show as a question mark in a black diamond in the text input field. If you need a screen shot just ask.

Thanks,
Justin
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Alex Harui-2
It looks like this was also a problem in 4.16.0.  Can you confirm?

-Alex

On 11/20/17, 8:58 PM, "Justin Mclean" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>> diff -w -r
>>apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/Sh
>>aredResources.properties
>>/Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/
>>SharedResources.properties
>> 39c39
>> < currencySymbol=�
>> ---
>>> currencySymbol=<A3>
>
>Just confirmed this is an issue and here's some example code to test it.
>To test compile with the en_GB locale.
>
><?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
><mx:Application xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"
>layout="absolute"  applicationComplete="format()">
> <mx:Script>
> <![CDATA[
> import mx.formatters.CurrencyFormatter;
>
> public function format():void{
> ti.text = formatter.format(ti.text).toString();
> }
> ]]>
> </mx:Script>
> <mx:CurrencyFormatter id="formatter" />
> <mx:TextInput id="ti" text="100" change="format()" />
></mx:Application>
>
>The currency symbol will show as a question mark in a black diamond in
>the text input field. If you need a screen shot just ask.
>
>Thanks,
>Justin

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Justin Mclean-5
Hi,

> It looks like this was also a problem in 4.16.0.  Can you confirm?

Doesn’t look like it from a quick look but I’ve not tried to compile against it (yet).

4.16.1 vs VC gives:

diff -w -r *src ~/flex-sdk | grep currencySymbol
< currencySymbol=
> currencySymbol=?

4.16.0 vs VC gives no differences.

Also the file types match 4.16.0 and what’s in version control (but it's not UTF-8):

4.16.1 RC:
$file apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
UTF-8 Unicode text, with CRLF line terminators

VC:
$file /Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
ISO-8859 text

4.16.0:
file /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.16/frameworks/projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
ISO-8859 text

Perhaps the SharedResources.properties has been incorrectly converted to UTF-8 when it actually should be ISO-8859? (The pound sign is character 163.) Perhaps we have a mix of text encodings for resource files?

Thanks,
Justin

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

piotrz
Hi,

Just the opposite. I have compiled your example with 4.16 and 4.15 and we
have exactly same issue.

Thanks, Piotr

2017-11-21 7:03 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean <[hidden email]>:

> Hi,
>
> > It looks like this was also a problem in 4.16.0.  Can you confirm?
>
> Doesn’t look like it from a quick look but I’ve not tried to compile
> against it (yet).
>
> 4.16.1 vs VC gives:
>
> diff -w -r *src ~/flex-sdk | grep currencySymbol
> < currencySymbol=
> > currencySymbol=?
>
> 4.16.0 vs VC gives no differences.
>
> Also the file types match 4.16.0 and what’s in version control (but it's
> not UTF-8):
>
> 4.16.1 RC:
> $file apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/
> bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
> UTF-8 Unicode text, with CRLF line terminators
>
> VC:
> $file /Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/
> bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
> ISO-8859 text
>
> 4.16.0:
> file /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.16/frameworks/
> projects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
> ISO-8859 text
>
> Perhaps the SharedResources.properties has been incorrectly converted to
> UTF-8 when it actually should be ISO-8859? (The pound sign is character
> 163.) Perhaps we have a mix of text encodings for resource files?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>


--

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

piotrz
We are using everywhere: JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS -Dfile.encoding=UTF8, your
suggestion is to use JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS ISO-8859 in the bundles builds ? Am
I understand correctly.

Piotr

2017-11-21 7:11 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <[hidden email]>:

> Hi,
>
> Just the opposite. I have compiled your example with 4.16 and 4.15 and we
> have exactly same issue.
>
> Thanks, Piotr
>
> 2017-11-21 7:03 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > It looks like this was also a problem in 4.16.0.  Can you confirm?
>>
>> Doesn’t look like it from a quick look but I’ve not tried to compile
>> against it (yet).
>>
>> 4.16.1 vs VC gives:
>>
>> diff -w -r *src ~/flex-sdk | grep currencySymbol
>> < currencySymbol=
>> > currencySymbol=?
>>
>> 4.16.0 vs VC gives no differences.
>>
>> Also the file types match 4.16.0 and what’s in version control (but it's
>> not UTF-8):
>>
>> 4.16.1 RC:
>> $file apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/bun
>> dles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
>> UTF-8 Unicode text, with CRLF line terminators
>>
>> VC:
>> $file /Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/b
>> undles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
>> ISO-8859 text
>>
>> 4.16.0:
>> file /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.16/frameworks/proj
>> ects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
>> ISO-8859 text
>>
>> Perhaps the SharedResources.properties has been incorrectly converted to
>> UTF-8 when it actually should be ISO-8859? (The pound sign is character
>> 163.) Perhaps we have a mix of text encodings for resource files?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
>



--

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

Alex Harui-2
My suggestion is to vote +1 and ship this release since this is not a new
issue.

I think there are code page issues in the source files.  Volunteers can
work it out later for the next release.  Let's get our users a release
that more of them can use.  IMO, releases do not have to be perfect.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 11/20/17, 10:13 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>We are using everywhere: JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS -Dfile.encoding=UTF8, your
>suggestion is to use JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS ISO-8859 in the bundles builds ? Am
>I understand correctly.
>
>Piotr
>
>2017-11-21 7:11 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just the opposite. I have compiled your example with 4.16 and 4.15 and
>>we
>> have exactly same issue.
>>
>> Thanks, Piotr
>>
>> 2017-11-21 7:03 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean <[hidden email]>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> > It looks like this was also a problem in 4.16.0.  Can you confirm?
>>>
>>> Doesn’t look like it from a quick look but I’ve not tried to compile
>>> against it (yet).
>>>
>>> 4.16.1 vs VC gives:
>>>
>>> diff -w -r *src ~/flex-sdk | grep currencySymbol
>>> < currencySymbol=
>>> > currencySymbol=?
>>>
>>> 4.16.0 vs VC gives no differences.
>>>
>>> Also the file types match 4.16.0 and what’s in version control (but
>>>it's
>>> not UTF-8):
>>>
>>> 4.16.1 RC:
>>> $file apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/bun
>>> dles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
>>> UTF-8 Unicode text, with CRLF line terminators
>>>
>>> VC:
>>> $file /Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/b
>>> undles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
>>> ISO-8859 text
>>>
>>> 4.16.0:
>>> file /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.16/frameworks/proj
>>> ects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
>>> ISO-8859 text
>>>
>>> Perhaps the SharedResources.properties has been incorrectly converted
>>>to
>>> UTF-8 when it actually should be ISO-8859? (The pound sign is character
>>> 163.) Perhaps we have a mix of text encodings for resource files?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Justin
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Piotr Zarzycki
>>
>> Patreon:
>>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6ff
>>79%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468416174018287&sdata=
>>%2BwIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0
>>
>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
>>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6ff
>>79%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468416174018287&sdata=
>>%2BwIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0>*
>>
>
>
>
>--
>
>Piotr Zarzycki
>
>Patreon:
>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6ff79
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468416174018287&sdata=%2B
>wIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0
><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
>eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6ff79
>%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636468416174018287&sdata=%2B
>wIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0>*

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16.1 - RC2*

piotrz
Alex,

What do you mean by this "I think there are code page issues in the source
files." ?

I have so far more +1 than -1 so I can release it, but wondering how to fix
it for the next release.

Thanks, Piotr


2017-11-21 7:17 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <[hidden email]>:

> My suggestion is to vote +1 and ship this release since this is not a new
> issue.
>
> I think there are code page issues in the source files.  Volunteers can
> work it out later for the next release.  Let's get our users a release
> that more of them can use.  IMO, releases do not have to be perfect.
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> On 11/20/17, 10:13 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> >We are using everywhere: JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS -Dfile.encoding=UTF8, your
> >suggestion is to use JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS ISO-8859 in the bundles builds ? Am
> >I understand correctly.
> >
> >Piotr
> >
> >2017-11-21 7:11 GMT+01:00 Piotr Zarzycki <[hidden email]>:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Just the opposite. I have compiled your example with 4.16 and 4.15 and
> >>we
> >> have exactly same issue.
> >>
> >> Thanks, Piotr
> >>
> >> 2017-11-21 7:03 GMT+01:00 Justin Mclean <[hidden email]>:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> > It looks like this was also a problem in 4.16.0.  Can you confirm?
> >>>
> >>> Doesn’t look like it from a quick look but I’ve not tried to compile
> >>> against it (yet).
> >>>
> >>> 4.16.1 vs VC gives:
> >>>
> >>> diff -w -r *src ~/flex-sdk | grep currencySymbol
> >>> < currencySymbol=
> >>> > currencySymbol=?
> >>>
> >>> 4.16.0 vs VC gives no differences.
> >>>
> >>> Also the file types match 4.16.0 and what’s in version control (but
> >>>it's
> >>> not UTF-8):
> >>>
> >>> 4.16.1 RC:
> >>> $file apache-flex-sdk-4.16.1-src/frameworks/projects/framework/bun
> >>> dles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
> >>> UTF-8 Unicode text, with CRLF line terminators
> >>>
> >>> VC:
> >>> $file /Users/justinmclean/flex-sdk/frameworks/projects/framework/b
> >>> undles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
> >>> ISO-8859 text
> >>>
> >>> 4.16.0:
> >>> file /Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlex4.16/frameworks/proj
> >>> ects/framework/bundles/en_GB/SharedResources.properties
> >>> ISO-8859 text
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps the SharedResources.properties has been incorrectly converted
> >>>to
> >>> UTF-8 when it actually should be ISO-8859? (The pound sign is character
> >>> 163.) Perhaps we have a mix of text encodings for resource files?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Justin
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Piotr Zarzycki
> >>
> >> Patreon:
> >>*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6
> ff
> >>79%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636468416174018287&sdata=
> >>%2BwIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0
> >>
> >><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pat
> >>reon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6
> ff
> >>79%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636468416174018287&sdata=
> >>%2BwIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0>*
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> >Patreon:
> >*https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6
> ff79
> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636468416174018287&sdata=%2B
> >wIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0
> ><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patr
> >eon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7C48d5b41ff9e0474bbb7008d530a6
> ff79
> >%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C636468416174018287&sdata=%2B
> >wIrnlUmTuWoolrB163Lm76rbc5ehA%2Bp6jIVcshmxZU%3D&reserved=0>*
>
>


--

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
12