[DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
12 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

Alex Harui-2
I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.  I
changed it again.

You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.

-Alex

On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
>
>EdB
>
>
>
>On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
>>before
>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>>
>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
>>break
>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
>>right?)
>>
>> EdB
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui <[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> What a dilemma!
>>>
>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I wanted
>>>to
>>> see what the trend was first.
>>>
>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
>>>Royale
>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have 10.
>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 of
>>>those
>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5 times,
>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
>>>Limber
>>> have 2 first place votes each.
>>>
>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on how
>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either given
>>>the
>>> other vote.
>>>
>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with low-quality
>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
>>>hindrance?
>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
>>>already
>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a show
>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
>>> opinion.
>>>
>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name is
>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
>>>
>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading this
>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
>>>redirect
>>> issue is worrisome.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.
>>>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff
>>>8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&s
>>>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "[hidden email] on behalf of OmPrakash
>>> Muppirala"
>>> <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Abstain (binding)
>>> >
>>> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I am abstaining for now.
>>> >>
>>> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>>> >><[hidden email]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Hi,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork of
>>> >>FlexJS
>>> >> > project.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > LIST:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Royale
>>> >> > Boja
>>> >> > Strand
>>> >> > Bead
>>> >> > Limber
>>> >> > Boinga
>>> >> > Braid
>>> >> > Arise
>>> >> >
>>> >> > HOW DO WE VOTE:
>>> >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most
>>> favorite
>>> >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have
>>> >>choose
>>> >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow
>>>it
>>> >>in
>>> >> > their lists
>>> >> >
>>> >> > EXAMPLE:
>>> >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points
>>> >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points
>>> >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point
>>> >> >
>>> >> > WINNER:
>>> >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the name.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Thanks,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Piotr
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>
>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>
>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
>> I.
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&data
>>=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2BU
>>tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Ix Multimedia Software
>
>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>3521 VB Utrecht
>
>T. 06-51952295
>I.
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&data=
>02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178
>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2BUtfl
>EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

Alex Harui-2
Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs 12.
 However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.

Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been mentioned
5 times, Beads 4 times.

-Alex

On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.  I
>changed it again.
>
>You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
>move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
>vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
>
>-Alex
>
>On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
>>
>>EdB
>>
>>
>>
>>On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <[hidden email]>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
>>>before
>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>>>
>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
>>>break
>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
>>>right?)
>>>
>>> EdB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What a dilemma!
>>>>
>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I wanted
>>>>to
>>>> see what the trend was first.
>>>>
>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
>>>>Royale
>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have 10.
>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 of
>>>>those
>>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5 times,
>>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
>>>>Limber
>>>> have 2 first place votes each.
>>>>
>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on
>>>>how
>>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either given
>>>>the
>>>> other vote.
>>>>
>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with low-quality
>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
>>>>hindrance?
>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
>>>>already
>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a show
>>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
>>>> opinion.
>>>>
>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name is
>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
>>>>
>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading
>>>>this
>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
>>>>redirect
>>>> issue is worrisome.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub
>>>>.
>>>>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4f
>>>>f
>>>>8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&
>>>>s
>>>>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0
>>>>
>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "[hidden email] on behalf of OmPrakash
>>>> Muppirala"
>>>> <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >Abstain (binding)
>>>> >
>>>> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <[hidden email]>
>>>>wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> I am abstaining for now.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>>>> >><[hidden email]>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Hi,
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork
>>>>of
>>>> >>FlexJS
>>>> >> > project.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > LIST:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Royale
>>>> >> > Boja
>>>> >> > Strand
>>>> >> > Bead
>>>> >> > Limber
>>>> >> > Boinga
>>>> >> > Braid
>>>> >> > Arise
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > HOW DO WE VOTE:
>>>> >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most
>>>> favorite
>>>> >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have
>>>> >>choose
>>>> >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can follow
>>>>it
>>>> >>in
>>>> >> > their lists
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > EXAMPLE:
>>>> >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points
>>>> >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points
>>>> >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > WINNER:
>>>> >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the
>>>>name.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Thanks,
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Piotr
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>
>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>
>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
>>> I.
>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&dat
>>>a
>>>=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c
>>>1
>>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2B
>>>U
>>>tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Ix Multimedia Software
>>
>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>3521 VB Utrecht
>>
>>T. 06-51952295
>>I.
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&data
>>=
>>02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c17
>>8
>>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2BUtf
>>l
>>EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

Alex Harui-2
Dave changed his abstention to a vote.

That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.

Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.

-Alex

On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs 12.
> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
>site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
>
>Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been mentioned
>5 times, Beads 4 times.
>
>-Alex
>
>On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.  I
>>changed it again.
>>
>>You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
>>move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
>>vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
>>
>>-Alex
>>
>>On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>>Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
>>>
>>>EdB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <[hidden email]>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
>>>>before
>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>>>>
>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
>>>>break
>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
>>>>right?)
>>>>
>>>> EdB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui <[hidden email]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> What a dilemma!
>>>>>
>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I wanted
>>>>>to
>>>>> see what the trend was first.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
>>>>>Royale
>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have
>>>>>10.
>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 of
>>>>>those
>>>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
>>>>>times,
>>>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
>>>>>Limber
>>>>> have 2 first place votes each.
>>>>>
>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on
>>>>>how
>>>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
>>>>>given
>>>>>the
>>>>> other vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
>>>>>low-quality
>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
>>>>>hindrance?
>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
>>>>>already
>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a show
>>>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
>>>>> opinion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name is
>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading
>>>>>this
>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
>>>>>redirect
>>>>> issue is worrisome.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithu
>>>>>b
>>>>>.
>>>>>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4
>>>>>f
>>>>>f
>>>>>8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288
>>>>>&
>>>>>s
>>>>>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "[hidden email] on behalf of OmPrakash
>>>>> Muppirala"
>>>>> <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >Abstain (binding)
>>>>> >
>>>>> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> I am abstaining for now.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>> >><[hidden email]>
>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Hi,
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork
>>>>>of
>>>>> >>FlexJS
>>>>> >> > project.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > LIST:
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Royale
>>>>> >> > Boja
>>>>> >> > Strand
>>>>> >> > Bead
>>>>> >> > Limber
>>>>> >> > Boinga
>>>>> >> > Braid
>>>>> >> > Arise
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > HOW DO WE VOTE:
>>>>> >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most
>>>>> favorite
>>>>> >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you have
>>>>> >>choose
>>>>> >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can
>>>>>follow
>>>>>it
>>>>> >>in
>>>>> >> > their lists
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > EXAMPLE:
>>>>> >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points
>>>>> >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points
>>>>> >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > WINNER:
>>>>> >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the
>>>>>name.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Thanks,
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > Piotr
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>
>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>
>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
>>>> I.
>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&da
>>>>t
>>>>a
>>>>=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2
>>>>c
>>>>1
>>>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2
>>>>B
>>>>U
>>>>tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Ix Multimedia Software
>>>
>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>3521 VB Utrecht
>>>
>>>T. 06-51952295
>>>I.
>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&dat
>>>a
>>>=
>>>02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
>>>7
>>>8
>>>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2BUt
>>>f
>>>l
>>>EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

Alex Harui-2
Piotr changed his vote.

It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13.
Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.

Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.

Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they aren't
concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.

-Alex

On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
>
>That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
>
>Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
>
>-Alex
>
>On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs
>>12.
>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
>>site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
>>
>>Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
>>mentioned
>>5 times, Beads 4 times.
>>
>>-Alex
>>
>>On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>>I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.  I
>>>changed it again.
>>>
>>>You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
>>>move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
>>>vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
>>>
>>>-Alex
>>>
>>>On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
>>>>
>>>>EdB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <[hidden email]>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
>>>>>before
>>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>>>>>
>>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
>>>>>break
>>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
>>>>>right?)
>>>>>
>>>>> EdB
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
>>>>><[hidden email]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> What a dilemma!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
>>>>>>wanted
>>>>>>to
>>>>>> see what the trend was first.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
>>>>>>Royale
>>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have
>>>>>>10.
>>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 of
>>>>>>those
>>>>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
>>>>>>times,
>>>>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
>>>>>>Limber
>>>>>> have 2 first place votes each.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on
>>>>>>how
>>>>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
>>>>>>given
>>>>>>the
>>>>>> other vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
>>>>>>low-quality
>>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
>>>>>>hindrance?
>>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
>>>>>>already
>>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a
>>>>>>show
>>>>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
>>>>>> opinion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name is
>>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading
>>>>>>this
>>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
>>>>>>redirect
>>>>>> issue is worrisome.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith
>>>>>>u
>>>>>>b
>>>>>>.
>>>>>>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d
>>>>>>4
>>>>>>f
>>>>>>f
>>>>>>8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C63641437321198628
>>>>>>8
>>>>>>&
>>>>>>s
>>>>>>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "[hidden email] on behalf of OmPrakash
>>>>>> Muppirala"
>>>>>> <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >Abstain (binding)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> I am abstaining for now.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>>> >><[hidden email]>
>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Hi,
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork
>>>>>>of
>>>>>> >>FlexJS
>>>>>> >> > project.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > LIST:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Royale
>>>>>> >> > Boja
>>>>>> >> > Strand
>>>>>> >> > Bead
>>>>>> >> > Limber
>>>>>> >> > Boinga
>>>>>> >> > Braid
>>>>>> >> > Arise
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > HOW DO WE VOTE:
>>>>>> >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most
>>>>>> favorite
>>>>>> >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you
>>>>>>have
>>>>>> >>choose
>>>>>> >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can
>>>>>>follow
>>>>>>it
>>>>>> >>in
>>>>>> >> > their lists
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > EXAMPLE:
>>>>>> >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points
>>>>>> >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points
>>>>>> >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > WINNER:
>>>>>> >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the
>>>>>>name.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Thanks,
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Piotr
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>>
>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>>
>>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
>>>>> I.
>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&d
>>>>>a
>>>>>t
>>>>>a
>>>>>=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed
>>>>>2
>>>>>c
>>>>>1
>>>>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%
>>>>>2
>>>>>B
>>>>>U
>>>>>tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>
>>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>>3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>
>>>>T. 06-51952295
>>>>I.
>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&da
>>>>t
>>>>a
>>>>=
>>>>02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c
>>>>1
>>>>7
>>>>8
>>>>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2BU
>>>>t
>>>>f
>>>>l
>>>>EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

Carlos Rovira
Hi Alex,

about your question in the other thread if I would help in logo and website
work: I commented that I need to be "connected" and "inspired" with the new
name, since is a huge task and effort just in the same way I was when I
contributed to MDL UI set.

I didn't want to comment too much about the other options (just when I
though I had some valuable opinión a side from my subjective inclinations),
but I must say that I don't see our project with a brand like Beads, Limber
or other options exposed, I feel more damage than benefits (but again this
is totally subjective).

But as well I think that should not incline the balance in favor of my
proposal. I'm completely done for it, but I think others should buy it and
believe in it. I even prefer to stick with "FlexJS" since when I first
started proposing a name change, it was for something that was a huge
meaning, and sorry, but can't find that in other proposals.

As I said, is a significant task to design website, logo, and so on and to
make that, due to the creative nature of the task, you need to be
completely trapped by the name, the meaning and the rest to get the most of
it, or we'll end with something worst.



2017-09-19 22:11 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <[hidden email]>:

> Piotr changed his vote.
>
> It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13.
> Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
>
> Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>
> Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they aren't
> concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
> Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> >Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
> >
> >That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
> >
> >Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
> >Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
> >
> >-Alex
> >
> >On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >>Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs
> >>12.
> >> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
> >>site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
> >>
> >>Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
> >>mentioned
> >>5 times, Beads 4 times.
> >>
> >>-Alex
> >>
> >>On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.  I
> >>>changed it again.
> >>>
> >>>You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
> >>>move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
> >>>vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
> >>>
> >>>-Alex
> >>>
> >>>On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
> >>>>
> >>>>EdB
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <[hidden email]>
> >>>>wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
> >>>>>before
> >>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
> >>>>>break
> >>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
> >>>>>right?)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> EdB
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
> >>>>><[hidden email]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> What a dilemma!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
> >>>>>>wanted
> >>>>>>to
> >>>>>> see what the trend was first.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
> >>>>>>Royale
> >>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have
> >>>>>>10.
> >>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3 of
> >>>>>>those
> >>>>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
> >>>>>>times,
> >>>>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
> >>>>>>Limber
> >>>>>> have 2 first place votes each.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on
> >>>>>>how
> >>>>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
> >>>>>>given
> >>>>>>the
> >>>>>> other vote.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
> >>>>>>low-quality
> >>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
> >>>>>>hindrance?
> >>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
> >>>>>>already
> >>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a
> >>>>>>show
> >>>>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
> >>>>>> opinion.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name is
> >>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading
> >>>>>>this
> >>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
> >>>>>>redirect
> >>>>>> issue is worrisome.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgith
> >>>>>>u
> >>>>>>b
> >>>>>>.
> >>>>>>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%
> 7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d
> >>>>>>4
> >>>>>>f
> >>>>>>f
> >>>>>>8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C63641437321198628
> >>>>>>8
> >>>>>>&
> >>>>>>s
> >>>>>>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "[hidden email] on behalf of OmPrakash
> >>>>>> Muppirala"
> >>>>>> <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> >Abstain (binding)
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <[hidden email]>
> >>>>>>wrote:
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >> I am abstaining for now.
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
> >>>>>> >><[hidden email]>
> >>>>>> >> wrote:
> >>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>> >> > Hi,
> >>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for fork
> >>>>>>of
> >>>>>> >>FlexJS
> >>>>>> >> > project.
> >>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>> >> > LIST:
> >>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>> >> > Royale
> >>>>>> >> > Boja
> >>>>>> >> > Strand
> >>>>>> >> > Bead
> >>>>>> >> > Limber
> >>>>>> >> > Boinga
> >>>>>> >> > Braid
> >>>>>> >> > Arise
> >>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>> >> > HOW DO WE VOTE:
> >>>>>> >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most
> >>>>>> favorite
> >>>>>> >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you
> >>>>>>have
> >>>>>> >>choose
> >>>>>> >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can
> >>>>>>follow
> >>>>>>it
> >>>>>> >>in
> >>>>>> >> > their lists
> >>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>> >> > EXAMPLE:
> >>>>>> >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points
> >>>>>> >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points
> >>>>>> >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point
> >>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>> >> > WINNER:
> >>>>>> >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the
> >>>>>>name.
> >>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>> >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
> >>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>> >> > Thanks,
> >>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>> >> > Piotr
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
> >>>>>
> >>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
> >>>>> I.
> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> www.ixsoftware.nl&d
> >>>>>a
> >>>>>t
> >>>>>a
> >>>>>=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80
> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed
> >>>>>2
> >>>>>c
> >>>>>1
> >>>>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=
> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%
> >>>>>2
> >>>>>B
> >>>>>U
> >>>>>tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>Ix Multimedia Software
> >>>>
> >>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >>>>3521 VB Utrecht
> >>>>
> >>>>T. 06-51952295
> >>>>I.
> >>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> www.ixsoftware.nl&da
> >>>>t
> >>>>a
> >>>>=
> >>>>02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80
> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c
> >>>>1
> >>>>7
> >>>>8
> >>>>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=
> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2BU
> >>>>t
> >>>>f
> >>>>l
> >>>>EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>


--

<http://www.codeoscopic.com>

Carlos Rovira

Director General

M: +34 607 22 60 05

http://www.codeoscopic.com

http://www.avant2.es


Conocenos en 1 minuto! <https://youtu.be/P2IEAYDG5HU>


Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.

De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

Alex Harui-2
In reply to this post by Alex Harui-2
Justin voted.

Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points.
Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9.

Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes.
Limber on 6 out of 12.

Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3.  Royale and Beads have
2.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>Piotr changed his vote.
>
>It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13.
>Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
>
>Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>
>Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they aren't
>concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
>Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
>
>-Alex
>
>On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>>Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
>>
>>That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
>>
>>Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>>Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
>>
>>-Alex
>>
>>On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>>Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs
>>>12.
>>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
>>>site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
>>>
>>>Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
>>>mentioned
>>>5 times, Beads 4 times.
>>>
>>>-Alex
>>>
>>>On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.
>>>>I
>>>>changed it again.
>>>>
>>>>You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
>>>>move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
>>>>vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
>>>>
>>>>-Alex
>>>>
>>>>On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
>>>>>
>>>>>EdB
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <[hidden email]>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
>>>>>>before
>>>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
>>>>>>break
>>>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
>>>>>>right?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EdB
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
>>>>>><[hidden email]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What a dilemma!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
>>>>>>>wanted
>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>> see what the trend was first.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
>>>>>>>Royale
>>>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have
>>>>>>>10.
>>>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3
>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>>those
>>>>>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
>>>>>>>times,
>>>>>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
>>>>>>>Limber
>>>>>>> have 2 first place votes each.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on
>>>>>>>how
>>>>>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
>>>>>>>given
>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>> other vote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
>>>>>>>low-quality
>>>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
>>>>>>>hindrance?
>>>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
>>>>>>>already
>>>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a
>>>>>>>show
>>>>>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
>>>>>>> opinion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name
>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading
>>>>>>>this
>>>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
>>>>>>>redirect
>>>>>>> issue is worrisome.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit
>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>u
>>>>>>>b
>>>>>>>.
>>>>>>>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08
>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>4
>>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364143732119862
>>>>>>>8
>>>>>>>8
>>>>>>>&
>>>>>>>s
>>>>>>>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "[hidden email] on behalf of OmPrakash
>>>>>>> Muppirala"
>>>>>>> <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >Abstain (binding)
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >> I am abstaining for now.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>>>> >><[hidden email]>
>>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > Hi,
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for
>>>>>>>fork
>>>>>>>of
>>>>>>> >>FlexJS
>>>>>>> >> > project.
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > LIST:
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > Royale
>>>>>>> >> > Boja
>>>>>>> >> > Strand
>>>>>>> >> > Bead
>>>>>>> >> > Limber
>>>>>>> >> > Boinga
>>>>>>> >> > Braid
>>>>>>> >> > Arise
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > HOW DO WE VOTE:
>>>>>>> >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most
>>>>>>> favorite
>>>>>>> >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you
>>>>>>>have
>>>>>>> >>choose
>>>>>>> >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can
>>>>>>>follow
>>>>>>>it
>>>>>>> >>in
>>>>>>> >> > their lists
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > EXAMPLE:
>>>>>>> >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points
>>>>>>> >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points
>>>>>>> >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > WINNER:
>>>>>>> >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the
>>>>>>>name.
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > Thanks,
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > Piotr
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>>>
>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
>>>>>> I.
>>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&
>>>>>>d
>>>>>>a
>>>>>>t
>>>>>>a
>>>>>>=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
>>>>>>d
>>>>>>2
>>>>>>c
>>>>>>1
>>>>>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu
>>>>>>%
>>>>>>2
>>>>>>B
>>>>>>U
>>>>>>tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>--
>>>>>Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>>
>>>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>>>3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>>
>>>>>T. 06-51952295
>>>>>I.
>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&d
>>>>>a
>>>>>t
>>>>>a
>>>>>=
>>>>>02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2
>>>>>c
>>>>>1
>>>>>7
>>>>>8
>>>>>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2B
>>>>>U
>>>>>t
>>>>>f
>>>>>l
>>>>>EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

piotrz
I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time.

Thanks,
Piotr

2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <[hidden email]>:

> Justin voted.
>
> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points.
> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9.
>
> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes.
> Limber on 6 out of 12.
>
> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3.  Royale and Beads have
> 2.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> >Piotr changed his vote.
> >
> >It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13.
> >Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
> >
> >Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
> >
> >Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they aren't
> >concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
> >Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
> >
> >-Alex
> >
> >On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >>Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
> >>
> >>That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
> >>
> >>Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
> >>Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
> >>
> >>-Alex
> >>
> >>On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs
> >>>12.
> >>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
> >>>site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
> >>>
> >>>Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
> >>>mentioned
> >>>5 times, Beads 4 times.
> >>>
> >>>-Alex
> >>>
> >>>On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.
> >>>>I
> >>>>changed it again.
> >>>>
> >>>>You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
> >>>>move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
> >>>>vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
> >>>>
> >>>>-Alex
> >>>>
> >>>>On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
> >>>>>
> >>>>>EdB
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <[hidden email]>
> >>>>>wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
> >>>>>>before
> >>>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
> >>>>>>break
> >>>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
> >>>>>>right?)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> EdB
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
> >>>>>><[hidden email]>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What a dilemma!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
> >>>>>>>wanted
> >>>>>>>to
> >>>>>>> see what the trend was first.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
> >>>>>>>Royale
> >>>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have
> >>>>>>>10.
> >>>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3
> >>>>>>>of
> >>>>>>>those
> >>>>>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
> >>>>>>>times,
> >>>>>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
> >>>>>>>Limber
> >>>>>>> have 2 first place votes each.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on
> >>>>>>>how
> >>>>>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
> >>>>>>>given
> >>>>>>>the
> >>>>>>> other vote.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
> >>>>>>>low-quality
> >>>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
> >>>>>>>hindrance?
> >>>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
> >>>>>>>already
> >>>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a
> >>>>>>>show
> >>>>>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
> >>>>>>> opinion.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name
> >>>>>>>is
> >>>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading
> >>>>>>>this
> >>>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
> >>>>>>>redirect
> >>>>>>> issue is worrisome.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> https%3A%2F%2Fgit
> >>>>>>>h
> >>>>>>>u
> >>>>>>>b
> >>>>>>>.
> >>>>>>>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%
> 7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08
> >>>>>>>d
> >>>>>>>4
> >>>>>>>f
> >>>>>>>f
> >>>>>>>8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> 7C6364143732119862
> >>>>>>>8
> >>>>>>>8
> >>>>>>>&
> >>>>>>>s
> >>>>>>>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "[hidden email] on behalf of OmPrakash
> >>>>>>> Muppirala"
> >>>>>>> <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> >Abstain (binding)
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <[hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>wrote:
> >>>>>>> >
> >>>>>>> >> I am abstaining for now.
> >>>>>>> >>
> >>>>>>> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
> >>>>>>> >><[hidden email]>
> >>>>>>> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>>> >> > Hi,
> >>>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>>> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for
> >>>>>>>fork
> >>>>>>>of
> >>>>>>> >>FlexJS
> >>>>>>> >> > project.
> >>>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>>> >> > LIST:
> >>>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>>> >> > Royale
> >>>>>>> >> > Boja
> >>>>>>> >> > Strand
> >>>>>>> >> > Bead
> >>>>>>> >> > Limber
> >>>>>>> >> > Boinga
> >>>>>>> >> > Braid
> >>>>>>> >> > Arise
> >>>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>>> >> > HOW DO WE VOTE:
> >>>>>>> >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most
> >>>>>>> favorite
> >>>>>>> >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you
> >>>>>>>have
> >>>>>>> >>choose
> >>>>>>> >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can
> >>>>>>>follow
> >>>>>>>it
> >>>>>>> >>in
> >>>>>>> >> > their lists
> >>>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>>> >> > EXAMPLE:
> >>>>>>> >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points
> >>>>>>> >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points
> >>>>>>> >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point
> >>>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>>> >> > WINNER:
> >>>>>>> >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the
> >>>>>>>name.
> >>>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>>> >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
> >>>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>>> >> > Thanks,
> >>>>>>> >> >
> >>>>>>> >> > Piotr
> >>>>>>> >>
> >>>>>>> >>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
> >>>>>> I.
> >>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> www.ixsoftware.nl&
> >>>>>>d
> >>>>>>a
> >>>>>>t
> >>>>>>a
> >>>>>>=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80
> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
> >>>>>>d
> >>>>>>2
> >>>>>>c
> >>>>>>1
> >>>>>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=
> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu
> >>>>>>%
> >>>>>>2
> >>>>>>B
> >>>>>>U
> >>>>>>tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--
> >>>>>Ix Multimedia Software
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >>>>>3521 VB Utrecht
> >>>>>
> >>>>>T. 06-51952295
> >>>>>I.
> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> www.ixsoftware.nl&d
> >>>>>a
> >>>>>t
> >>>>>a
> >>>>>=
> >>>>>02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80
> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2
> >>>>>c
> >>>>>1
> >>>>>7
> >>>>>8
> >>>>>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=
> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2B
> >>>>>U
> >>>>>t
> >>>>>f
> >>>>>l
> >>>>>EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>


--

Piotr Zarzycki

mobile: +48 880 859 557
skype: zarzycki10

LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

piotrz
I'm sorry I meant 09/20/2017.

2017-09-19 23:51 GMT+02:00 Piotr Zarzycki <[hidden email]>:

> I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Justin voted.
>>
>> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points.
>> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9.
>>
>> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes.
>> Limber on 6 out of 12.
>>
>> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3.  Royale and Beads have
>> 2.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> >Piotr changed his vote.
>> >
>> >It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13.
>> >Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
>> >
>> >Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>> >
>> >Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they
>> aren't
>> >concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
>> >Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
>> >
>> >-Alex
>> >
>> >On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> >>Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
>> >>
>> >>That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
>> >>
>> >>Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>> >>Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
>> >>
>> >>-Alex
>> >>
>> >>On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs
>> >>>12.
>> >>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
>> >>>site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
>> >>>
>> >>>Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
>> >>>mentioned
>> >>>5 times, Beads 4 times.
>> >>>
>> >>>-Alex
>> >>>
>> >>>On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.
>> >>>>I
>> >>>>changed it again.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone
>> can
>> >>>>move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase
>> the
>> >>>>vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>-Alex
>> >>>>
>> >>>>On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>EdB
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <[hidden email]>
>> >>>>>wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
>> >>>>>>before
>> >>>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I
>> can
>> >>>>>>break
>> >>>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
>> >>>>>>right?)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> EdB
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
>> >>>>>><[hidden email]>
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> What a dilemma!
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
>> >>>>>>>wanted
>> >>>>>>>to
>> >>>>>>> see what the trend was first.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to
>> third,
>> >>>>>>>Royale
>> >>>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have
>> >>>>>>>10.
>> >>>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3
>> >>>>>>>of
>> >>>>>>>those
>> >>>>>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
>> >>>>>>>times,
>> >>>>>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
>> >>>>>>>Limber
>> >>>>>>> have 2 first place votes each.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend
>> on
>> >>>>>>>how
>> >>>>>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
>> >>>>>>>given
>> >>>>>>>the
>> >>>>>>> other vote.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
>> >>>>>>>low-quality
>> >>>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
>> >>>>>>>hindrance?
>> >>>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
>> >>>>>>>already
>> >>>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a
>> >>>>>>>show
>> >>>>>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get
>> their
>> >>>>>>> opinion.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name
>> >>>>>>>is
>> >>>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading
>> >>>>>>>this
>> >>>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
>> >>>>>>>redirect
>> >>>>>>> issue is worrisome.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Thoughts?
>> >>>>>>> -Alex
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> [1]
>> >>>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=ht
>> tps%3A%2F%2Fgit
>> >>>>>>>h
>> >>>>>>>u
>> >>>>>>>b
>> >>>>>>>.
>> >>>>>>>com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144b
>> d1c1e428f8fed08
>> >>>>>>>d
>> >>>>>>>4
>> >>>>>>>f
>> >>>>>>>f
>> >>>>>>>8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6
>> 364143732119862
>> >>>>>>>8
>> >>>>>>>8
>> >>>>>>>&
>> >>>>>>>s
>> >>>>>>>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "[hidden email] on behalf of OmPrakash
>> >>>>>>> Muppirala"
>> >>>>>>> <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> >Abstain (binding)
>> >>>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>> >On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <[hidden email]>
>> >>>>>>>wrote:
>> >>>>>>> >
>> >>>>>>> >> I am abstaining for now.
>> >>>>>>> >>
>> >>>>>>> >> > On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>> >>>>>>> >><[hidden email]>
>> >>>>>>> >> wrote:
>> >>>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>>> >> > Hi,
>> >>>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>>> >> > In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for
>> >>>>>>>fork
>> >>>>>>>of
>> >>>>>>> >>FlexJS
>> >>>>>>> >> > project.
>> >>>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>>> >> > LIST:
>> >>>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>>> >> > Royale
>> >>>>>>> >> > Boja
>> >>>>>>> >> > Strand
>> >>>>>>> >> > Bead
>> >>>>>>> >> > Limber
>> >>>>>>> >> > Boinga
>> >>>>>>> >> > Braid
>> >>>>>>> >> > Arise
>> >>>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>>> >> > HOW DO WE VOTE:
>> >>>>>>> >> > 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most
>> >>>>>>> favorite
>> >>>>>>> >> > 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you
>> >>>>>>>have
>> >>>>>>> >>choose
>> >>>>>>> >> > 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can
>> >>>>>>>follow
>> >>>>>>>it
>> >>>>>>> >>in
>> >>>>>>> >> > their lists
>> >>>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>>> >> > EXAMPLE:
>> >>>>>>> >> > 1) Name1 - 3 points
>> >>>>>>> >> > 2) Name2 - 2 points
>> >>>>>>> >> > 3) Name3 - 1 point
>> >>>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>>> >> > WINNER:
>> >>>>>>> >> > We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the
>> >>>>>>>name.
>> >>>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>>> >> > The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
>> >>>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>>> >> > Thanks,
>> >>>>>>> >> >
>> >>>>>>> >> > Piotr
>> >>>>>>> >>
>> >>>>>>> >>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> >>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
>> >>>>>> I.
>> >>>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www
>> .ixsoftware.nl&
>> >>>>>>d
>> >>>>>>a
>> >>>>>>t
>> >>>>>>a
>> >>>>>>=02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%
>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
>> >>>>>>d
>> >>>>>>2
>> >>>>>>c
>> >>>>>>1
>> >>>>>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%
>> 2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu
>> >>>>>>%
>> >>>>>>2
>> >>>>>>B
>> >>>>>>U
>> >>>>>>tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>--
>> >>>>>Ix Multimedia Software
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> >>>>>3521 VB Utrecht
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>T. 06-51952295
>> >>>>>I.
>> >>>>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.
>> ixsoftware.nl&d
>> >>>>>a
>> >>>>>t
>> >>>>>a
>> >>>>>=
>> >>>>>02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff8024b8%
>> 7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2
>> >>>>>c
>> >>>>>1
>> >>>>>7
>> >>>>>8
>> >>>>>decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=Jb7%
>> 2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2B
>> >>>>>U
>> >>>>>t
>> >>>>>f
>> >>>>>l
>> >>>>>EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> mobile: +48 880 859 557 <+48%20880%20859%20557>
> skype: zarzycki10
>
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
>



--

Piotr Zarzycki

mobile: +48 880 859 557
skype: zarzycki10

LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
<https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

Harbs
In reply to this post by piotrz
Thanks Piotr.

Looks like we’re now Royale. :-)

Harbs

> On Sep 20, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Justin voted.
>>
>> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points.
>> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9.
>>
>> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes.
>> Limber on 6 out of 12.
>>
>> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3.  Royale and Beads have
>> 2.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>>> Piotr changed his vote.
>>>
>>> It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13.
>>> Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
>>>
>>> Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>>>
>>> Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they aren't
>>> concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
>>> Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
>>>
>>> -Alex
>>>
>>> On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
>>>>
>>>> That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
>>>>
>>>> Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>>>> Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>> On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13 vs
>>>>> 12.
>>>>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
>>>>> site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
>>>>> mentioned
>>>>> 5 times, Beads 4 times.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for Gmail.
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> changed it again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone can
>>>>>> move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase the
>>>>>> vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> EdB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
>>>>>>>> before
>>>>>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I can
>>>>>>>> break
>>>>>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
>>>>>>>> right?)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> EdB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What a dilemma!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
>>>>>>>>> wanted
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> see what the trend was first.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to third,
>>>>>>>>> Royale
>>>>>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber have
>>>>>>>>> 10.
>>>>>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
>>>>>>>>> times,
>>>>>>>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).  Royale,
>>>>>>>>> Limber
>>>>>>>>> have 2 first place votes each.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend on
>>>>>>>>> how
>>>>>>>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
>>>>>>>>> given
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> other vote.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
>>>>>>>>> low-quality
>>>>>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
>>>>>>>>> hindrance?
>>>>>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a
>>>>>>>>> show
>>>>>>>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get their
>>>>>>>>> opinion.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After reading
>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
>>>>>>>>> redirect
>>>>>>>>> issue is worrisome.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> https%3A%2F%2Fgit
>>>>>>>>> h
>>>>>>>>> u
>>>>>>>>> b
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>> com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%
>> 7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08
>>>>>>>>> d
>>>>>>>>> 4
>>>>>>>>> f
>>>>>>>>> f
>>>>>>>>> 8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> 7C6364143732119862
>>>>>>>>> 8
>>>>>>>>> 8
>>>>>>>>> &
>>>>>>>>> s
>>>>>>>>> data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "[hidden email] on behalf of OmPrakash
>>>>>>>>> Muppirala"
>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Abstain (binding)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am abstaining for now.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for
>>>>>>>>> fork
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>> FlexJS
>>>>>>>>>>>> project.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> LIST:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Royale
>>>>>>>>>>>> Boja
>>>>>>>>>>>> Strand
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bead
>>>>>>>>>>>> Limber
>>>>>>>>>>>> Boinga
>>>>>>>>>>>> Braid
>>>>>>>>>>>> Arise
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> HOW DO WE VOTE:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most
>>>>>>>>> favorite
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you
>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>> choose
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can
>>>>>>>>> follow
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>> their lists
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> EXAMPLE:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Name1 - 3 points
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Name2 - 2 points
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Name3 - 1 point
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> WINNER:
>>>>>>>>>>>> We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the
>>>>>>>>> name.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
>>>>>>>> I.
>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> www.ixsoftware.nl&
>>>>>>>> d
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> t
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> =02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80
>> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
>>>>>>>> d
>>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>> c
>>>>>>>> 1
>>>>>>>> 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=
>> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu
>>>>>>>> %
>>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>> B
>>>>>>>> U
>>>>>>>> tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> T. 06-51952295
>>>>>>> I.
>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> www.ixsoftware.nl&d
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> t
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> =
>>>>>>> 02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80
>> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2
>>>>>>> c
>>>>>>> 1
>>>>>>> 7
>>>>>>> 8
>>>>>>> decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=
>> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2B
>>>>>>> U
>>>>>>> t
>>>>>>> f
>>>>>>> l
>>>>>>> EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> mobile: +48 880 859 557
> skype: zarzycki10
>
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

Carlos Rovira
Thanks Piotr, just see the results and very happy to see that Royale was
the most voted. Now is time to work the brand to make us shine.

:)

Carlos

2017-09-20 9:00 GMT+02:00 Harbs <[hidden email]>:

> Thanks Piotr.
>
> Looks like we’re now Royale. :-)
>
> Harbs
>
> > On Sep 20, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <[hidden email]>:
> >
> >> Justin voted.
> >>
> >> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points.
> >> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9.
> >>
> >> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes.
> >> Limber on 6 out of 12.
> >>
> >> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3.  Royale and Beads
> have
> >> 2.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Piotr changed his vote.
> >>>
> >>> It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at 13.
> >>> Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
> >>>
> >>> Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
> >>>
> >>> Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they
> aren't
> >>> concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
> >>> Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
> >>>
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
> >>>>
> >>>> That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
> >>>>
> >>>> Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
> >>>> Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13
> vs
> >>>>> 12.
> >>>>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an adult
> >>>>> site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
> >>>>> mentioned
> >>>>> 5 times, Beads 4 times.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for
> Gmail.
> >>>>>> I
> >>>>>> changed it again.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote alone
> can
> >>>>>> move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually increase
> the
> >>>>>> vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> EdB
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <[hidden email]
> >
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with went
> >>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I
> can
> >>>>>>>> break
> >>>>>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE closes,
> >>>>>>>> right?)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> EdB
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
> >>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> What a dilemma!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
> >>>>>>>>> wanted
> >>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>> see what the trend was first.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to
> third,
> >>>>>>>>> Royale
> >>>>>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber
> have
> >>>>>>>>> 10.
> >>>>>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times), but 3
> >>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>> those
> >>>>>>>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
> >>>>>>>>> times,
> >>>>>>>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).
> Royale,
> >>>>>>>>> Limber
> >>>>>>>>> have 2 first place votes each.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will depend
> on
> >>>>>>>>> how
> >>>>>>>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS either
> >>>>>>>>> given
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> other vote.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
> >>>>>>>>> low-quality
> >>>>>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
> >>>>>>>>> hindrance?
> >>>>>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project is
> >>>>>>>>> already
> >>>>>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as a
> >>>>>>>>> show
> >>>>>>>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get
> their
> >>>>>>>>> opinion.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which name
> >>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After
> reading
> >>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell checker
> >>>>>>>>> redirect
> >>>>>>>>> issue is worrisome.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>> -Alex
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> https%3A%2F%2Fgit
> >>>>>>>>> h
> >>>>>>>>> u
> >>>>>>>>> b
> >>>>>>>>> .
> >>>>>>>>> com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%
> >> 7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08
> >>>>>>>>> d
> >>>>>>>>> 4
> >>>>>>>>> f
> >>>>>>>>> f
> >>>>>>>>> 8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> >> 7C6364143732119862
> >>>>>>>>> 8
> >>>>>>>>> 8
> >>>>>>>>> &
> >>>>>>>>> s
> >>>>>>>>> data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "[hidden email] on behalf of OmPrakash
> >>>>>>>>> Muppirala"
> >>>>>>>>> <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Abstain (binding)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <[hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I am abstaining for now.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
> >>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for
> >>>>>>>>> fork
> >>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>> FlexJS
> >>>>>>>>>>>> project.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> LIST:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Royale
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Boja
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Strand
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Bead
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Limber
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Boinga
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Braid
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Arise
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> HOW DO WE VOTE:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the most
> >>>>>>>>> favorite
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you
> >>>>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>>>> choose
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can
> >>>>>>>>> follow
> >>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>> their lists
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> EXAMPLE:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Name1 - 3 points
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Name2 - 2 points
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Name3 - 1 point
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> WINNER:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the
> >>>>>>>>> name.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >>>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
> >>>>>>>> I.
> >>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> www.ixsoftware.nl&
> >>>>>>>> d
> >>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>> t
> >>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>> =02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80
> >> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
> >>>>>>>> d
> >>>>>>>> 2
> >>>>>>>> c
> >>>>>>>> 1
> >>>>>>>> 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=
> >> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu
> >>>>>>>> %
> >>>>>>>> 2
> >>>>>>>> B
> >>>>>>>> U
> >>>>>>>> tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> T. 06-51952295
> >>>>>>> I.
> >>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> >> www.ixsoftware.nl&d
> >>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>> t
> >>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>> =
> >>>>>>> 02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80
> >> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2
> >>>>>>> c
> >>>>>>> 1
> >>>>>>> 7
> >>>>>>> 8
> >>>>>>> decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=
> >> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2B
> >>>>>>> U
> >>>>>>> t
> >>>>>>> f
> >>>>>>> l
> >>>>>>> EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > mobile: +48 880 859 557
> > skype: zarzycki10
> >
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
> > <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
>
>


--

<http://www.codeoscopic.com>

Carlos Rovira

Director General

M: +34 607 22 60 05

http://www.codeoscopic.com

http://www.avant2.es


Conocenos en 1 minuto! <https://youtu.be/P2IEAYDG5HU>


Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.

De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

piotrz
Carlos,

If you will need any help and my time allows let me know. :)

Piotr

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017, 09:29 Carlos Rovira <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Thanks Piotr, just see the results and very happy to see that Royale was
> the most voted. Now is time to work the brand to make us shine.
>
> :)
>
> Carlos
>
> 2017-09-20 9:00 GMT+02:00 Harbs <[hidden email]>:
>
> > Thanks Piotr.
> >
> > Looks like we’re now Royale. :-)
> >
> > Harbs
> >
> > > On Sep 20, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Piotr Zarzycki <
> [hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <[hidden email]>:
> > >
> > >> Justin voted.
> > >>
> > >> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points.
> > >> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9.
> > >>
> > >> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes.
> > >> Limber on 6 out of 12.
> > >>
> > >> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3.  Royale and Beads
> > have
> > >> 2.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> -Alex
> > >>
> > >> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Piotr changed his vote.
> > >>>
> > >>> It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at
> 13.
> > >>> Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
> > >>>
> > >>> Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
> > >>>
> > >>> Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they
> > aren't
> > >>> concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
> > >>> Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
> > >>>
> > >>> -Alex
> > >>>
> > >>> On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
> > >>>> Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -Alex
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale, 13
> > vs
> > >>>>> 12.
> > >>>>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an
> adult
> > >>>>> site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
> > >>>>> mentioned
> > >>>>> 5 times, Beads 4 times.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -Alex
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for
> > Gmail.
> > >>>>>> I
> > >>>>>> changed it again.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote
> alone
> > can
> > >>>>>> move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually
> increase
> > the
> > >>>>>> vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -Alex
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> EdB
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin <
> [hidden email]
> > >
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with
> went
> > >>>>>>>> before
> > >>>>>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If I
> > can
> > >>>>>>>> break
> > >>>>>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE
> closes,
> > >>>>>>>> right?)
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> EdB
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
> > >>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> What a dilemma!
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
> > >>>>>>>>> wanted
> > >>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>> see what the trend was first.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to
> > third,
> > >>>>>>>>> Royale
> > >>>>>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber
> > have
> > >>>>>>>>> 10.
> > >>>>>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times),
> but 3
> > >>>>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>> those
> > >>>>>>>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned 5
> > >>>>>>>>> times,
> > >>>>>>>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).
> > Royale,
> > >>>>>>>>> Limber
> > >>>>>>>>> have 2 first place votes each.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will
> depend
> > on
> > >>>>>>>>> how
> > >>>>>>>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS
> either
> > >>>>>>>>> given
> > >>>>>>>>> the
> > >>>>>>>>> other vote.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
> > >>>>>>>>> low-quality
> > >>>>>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
> > >>>>>>>>> hindrance?
> > >>>>>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github project
> is
> > >>>>>>>>> already
> > >>>>>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that as
> a
> > >>>>>>>>> show
> > >>>>>>>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get
> > their
> > >>>>>>>>> opinion.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which
> name
> > >>>>>>>>> is
> > >>>>>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After
> > reading
> > >>>>>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell
> checker
> > >>>>>>>>> redirect
> > >>>>>>>>> issue is worrisome.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
> > >>>>>>>>> -Alex
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> [1]
> > >>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > >> https%3A%2F%2Fgit
> > >>>>>>>>> h
> > >>>>>>>>> u
> > >>>>>>>>> b
> > >>>>>>>>> .
> > >>>>>>>>> com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%
> > >> 7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08
> > >>>>>>>>> d
> > >>>>>>>>> 4
> > >>>>>>>>> f
> > >>>>>>>>> f
> > >>>>>>>>> 8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
> > >> 7C6364143732119862
> > >>>>>>>>> 8
> > >>>>>>>>> 8
> > >>>>>>>>> &
> > >>>>>>>>> s
> > >>>>>>>>>
> data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "[hidden email] on behalf of
> OmPrakash
> > >>>>>>>>> Muppirala"
> > >>>>>>>>> <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Abstain (binding)
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher" <
> [hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I am abstaining for now.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
> > >>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for
> > >>>>>>>>> fork
> > >>>>>>>>> of
> > >>>>>>>>>>> FlexJS
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> project.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> LIST:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Royale
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Boja
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Strand
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Bead
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Limber
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Boinga
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Braid
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Arise
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> HOW DO WE VOTE:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the
> most
> > >>>>>>>>> favorite
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you
> > >>>>>>>>> have
> > >>>>>>>>>>> choose
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can
> > >>>>>>>>> follow
> > >>>>>>>>> it
> > >>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> their lists
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> EXAMPLE:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Name1 - 3 points
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Name2 - 2 points
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Name3 - 1 point
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> WINNER:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of the
> > >>>>>>>>> name.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> > >>>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
> > >>>>>>>> I.
> > >>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > >> www.ixsoftware.nl&
> > >>>>>>>> d
> > >>>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>> t
> > >>>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>>> =02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80
> > >> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
> > >>>>>>>> d
> > >>>>>>>> 2
> > >>>>>>>> c
> > >>>>>>>> 1
> > >>>>>>>> 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=
> > >> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu
> > >>>>>>>> %
> > >>>>>>>> 2
> > >>>>>>>> B
> > >>>>>>>> U
> > >>>>>>>> tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> > >>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> T. 06-51952295
> > >>>>>>> I.
> > >>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> > >> www.ixsoftware.nl&d
> > >>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>> t
> > >>>>>>> a
> > >>>>>>> =
> > >>>>>>> 02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80
> > >> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2
> > >>>>>>> c
> > >>>>>>> 1
> > >>>>>>> 7
> > >>>>>>> 8
> > >>>>>>> decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=
> > >> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2B
> > >>>>>>> U
> > >>>>>>> t
> > >>>>>>> f
> > >>>>>>> l
> > >>>>>>> EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > mobile: +48 880 859 557
> > > skype: zarzycki10
> > >
> > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> <http://www.codeoscopic.com>
>
> Carlos Rovira
>
> Director General
>
> M: +34 607 22 60 05
>
> http://www.codeoscopic.com
>
> http://www.avant2.es
>
>
> Conocenos en 1 minuto! <https://youtu.be/P2IEAYDG5HU>
>
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
> información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
> error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
> proceda a su destrucción.
>
> De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
> que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
> S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
> servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
> rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
> oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
> necesaria.
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [DISCUSS] (was Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?)

Alex Harui-2
In reply to this post by Carlos Rovira
Well, it isn't official until the board approves, hopefully tomorrow.

I updated the board resolution, and modified the board report and added
"Apache Royale will take responsibility for
what is now Apache FlexJS and related repos."

I also updated the PODLINGNAMESEARCH JIRA issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-132

Thanks,
-Alex

On 9/20/17, 12:29 AM, "[hidden email] on behalf of Carlos Rovira"
<[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:

>Thanks Piotr, just see the results and very happy to see that Royale was
>the most voted. Now is time to work the brand to make us shine.
>
>:)
>
>Carlos
>
>2017-09-20 9:00 GMT+02:00 Harbs <[hidden email]>:
>
>> Thanks Piotr.
>>
>> Looks like we’re now Royale. :-)
>>
>> Harbs
>>
>> > On Sep 20, 2017, at 12:51 AM, Piotr Zarzycki
>><[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I will end voting tomorrow 09/19/2017 6:00 - 7:00 UTC Time.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Piotr
>> >
>> > 2017-09-19 23:15 GMT+02:00 Alex Harui <[hidden email]>:
>> >
>> >> Justin voted.
>> >>
>> >> Now we have Royale and Limber tied again with 13 points.
>> >> Beads has 11, Braids as 10. Arise has 9.
>> >>
>> >> Royale has been mentioned on 7 out of 12 votes.
>> >> Limber on 6 out of 12.
>> >>
>> >> Limber still has the most first-place votes with 3.  Royale and Beads
>> have
>> >> 2.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >> On 9/19/17, 1:11 PM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Piotr changed his vote.
>> >>>
>> >>> It dropped Royale back to 12 points, putting Limber in the lead at
>>13.
>> >>> Arise is now third at 9 points.  Beads, Boja, Braid all have 8.
>> >>>
>> >>> Royale and Limber both have been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>> >>>
>> >>> Trademarks responded that, without thinking about it too much, they
>> aren't
>> >>> concerned about these small projects on GitHub, so if we end up with
>> >>> Royale, it won't be quickly blocked by Trademarks.
>> >>>
>> >>> -Alex
>> >>>
>> >>> On 9/19/17, 11:21 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Dave changed his abstention to a vote.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> That tied Limber with Royale at 13 each.  Beads now has 11.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Royale and Limber have now been mentioned on 6 out of 11 votes.
>> >>>> Boja and Beads have been mentioned 5 times.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -Alex
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 9/19/17, 11:12 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]>
>>wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Erik changed his vote.  That put Limber in the lead over Royale,
>>13
>> vs
>> >>>>> 12.
>> >>>>> However, several folks are concerned about limber.com being an
>>adult
>> >>>>> site.  Limber has been mentioned on 6 votes.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Beads and Boja have 9 votes each now.  Boja and Royale have been
>> >>>>> mentioned
>> >>>>> 5 times, Beads 4 times.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> -Alex
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:11 AM, "Alex Harui" <[hidden email]>
>>wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> I did change the subject to discuss, but may be not enough for
>> Gmail.
>> >>>>>> I
>> >>>>>> changed it again.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> You can change your vote until the vote closes, but your vote
>>alone
>> can
>> >>>>>> move Bend enough to make a difference.  You could actually
>>increase
>> the
>> >>>>>> vote gap between Royale and Beads and Boja.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> -Alex
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 9/19/17, 10:01 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Sorry, that should have gone to the DISCUSS thread :-(
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> EdB
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Erik de Bruin
>><[hidden email]
>> >
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> I really don't like Royale, because it has no connection with
>>went
>> >>>>>>>> before
>> >>>>>>>> it, which Beads, Boja, Bend and Limber all do.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> My new favorite is Limber, but I still like Bend very much. If
>>I
>> can
>> >>>>>>>> break
>> >>>>>>>> a tie, I'll change my vote (I can do that, before the VOTE
>>closes,
>> >>>>>>>> right?)
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> EdB
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Alex Harui
>> >>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> What a dilemma!
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> I've seen 10 votes and 2 abstentions.  I haven't voted yet.  I
>> >>>>>>>>> wanted
>> >>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>> see what the trend was first.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> If you assign 3 points to first place, 2 to second, and 1 to
>> third,
>> >>>>>>>>> Royale
>> >>>>>>>>> has the lead at 12 points, but barely:  Bead, Boja and Limber
>> have
>> >>>>>>>>> 10.
>> >>>>>>>>> Boja has been mentioned more than any other name (6 times),
>>but 3
>> >>>>>>>>> of
>> >>>>>>>>> those
>> >>>>>>>>> are third place votes.  Royale and Limber have been mentioned
>>5
>> >>>>>>>>> times,
>> >>>>>>>>> Beads 4 times.  Beads has the most first place votes (3).
>> Royale,
>> >>>>>>>>> Limber
>> >>>>>>>>> have 2 first place votes each.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> In short, I don't think there is a clear winner.  It will
>>depend
>> on
>> >>>>>>>>> how
>> >>>>>>>>> you count the votes.  And we can't default back to FlexJS
>>either
>> >>>>>>>>> given
>> >>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>> other vote.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> I know some folks mentioned that Royale is associated with
>> >>>>>>>>> low-quality
>> >>>>>>>>> foods, but does anybody think choosing Royale will be a major
>> >>>>>>>>> hindrance?
>> >>>>>>>>> There is a possible conflict because some other Github
>>project is
>> >>>>>>>>> already
>> >>>>>>>>> using Royale [1] for a JS framework.  Does anybody see that
>>as a
>> >>>>>>>>> show
>> >>>>>>>>> stopper?  I think I will write to trademarks@ and try to get
>> their
>> >>>>>>>>> opinion.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Carlos, will you help with a new website regardless of which
>>name
>> >>>>>>>>> is
>> >>>>>>>>> chosen or only if it is Royale (or Crown)?
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Is anybody adamantly against Beads, Boja or Limber?  After
>> reading
>> >>>>>>>>> this
>> >>>>>>>>> mornings posts, I'm leaning away from limber.  The spell
>>checker
>> >>>>>>>>> redirect
>> >>>>>>>>> issue is worrisome.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>> >>>>>>>>> -Alex
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> [1]
>> >>>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >> https%3A%2F%2Fgit
>> >>>>>>>>> h
>> >>>>>>>>> u
>> >>>>>>>>> b
>> >>>>>>>>> .
>> >>>>>>>>> com%2Fian-culleton%2Froyale&data=02%7C01%7C%
>> >> 7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08
>> >>>>>>>>> d
>> >>>>>>>>> 4
>> >>>>>>>>> f
>> >>>>>>>>> f
>> >>>>>>>>> 8024b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%
>> >> 7C6364143732119862
>> >>>>>>>>> 8
>> >>>>>>>>> 8
>> >>>>>>>>> &
>> >>>>>>>>> s
>> >>>>>>>>>
>>data=LJJ2CXVQIkKbdqguqcQFfKFfeXx%2FAem5Zs3UTcE7W8M%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On 9/18/17, 10:48 AM, "[hidden email] on behalf of
>>OmPrakash
>> >>>>>>>>> Muppirala"
>> >>>>>>>>> <[hidden email] on behalf of [hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Abstain (binding)
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2017 10:47 AM, "Dave Fisher"
>><[hidden email]>
>> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> I am abstaining for now.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Piotr Zarzycki
>> >>>>>>>>>>> <[hidden email]>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In this thread I've gathered list of names proposition for
>> >>>>>>>>> fork
>> >>>>>>>>> of
>> >>>>>>>>>>> FlexJS
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> project.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> LIST:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Royale
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Boja
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Strand
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Bead
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Limber
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Boinga
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Braid
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Arise
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> HOW DO WE VOTE:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Pick up 3 names from the list and order them from the
>>most
>> >>>>>>>>> favorite
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) We will give points for each items in the list which you
>> >>>>>>>>> have
>> >>>>>>>>>>> choose
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) In your list you can propose your own name - others can
>> >>>>>>>>> follow
>> >>>>>>>>> it
>> >>>>>>>>>>> in
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> their lists
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> EXAMPLE:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Name1 - 3 points
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) Name2 - 2 points
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Name3 - 1 point
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> WINNER:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We will pickup winner based on gathered points by one of
>>the
>> >>>>>>>>> name.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open until Tuesday September 19, 23:00 UTC
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Piotr
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> >>>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> T. 06-51952295 <06%2051952295>
>> >>>>>>>> I.
>> >>>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >>
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&data
>>=02%7C01%7C%7Cacc270f8127d49db794408d4fff961d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414893956825588&sdata=HW3%2FlgNCS3Qq6Zj75EWw7RkFj99
>>TBeSMdm6AwkIIxlI%3D&reserved=0&
>> >>>>>>>> d
>> >>>>>>>> a
>> >>>>>>>> t
>> >>>>>>>> a
>> >>>>>>>> =02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80
>> >> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794ae
>> >>>>>>>> d
>> >>>>>>>> 2
>> >>>>>>>> c
>> >>>>>>>> 1
>> >>>>>>>> 78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=
>> >> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu
>> >>>>>>>> %
>> >>>>>>>> 2
>> >>>>>>>> B
>> >>>>>>>> U
>> >>>>>>>> tflEL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> >>>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> T. 06-51952295
>> >>>>>>> I.
>> >>>>>>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
>> >>
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.ixsoftware.nl&data
>>=02%7C01%7C%7Cacc270f8127d49db794408d4fff961d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c1
>>78decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414893956825588&sdata=HW3%2FlgNCS3Qq6Zj75EWw7RkFj99
>>TBeSMdm6AwkIIxlI%3D&reserved=0&d
>> >>>>>>> a
>> >>>>>>> t
>> >>>>>>> a
>> >>>>>>> =
>> >>>>>>> 02%7C01%7C%7Cbbc144bd1c1e428f8fed08d4ff80
>> >> 24b8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2
>> >>>>>>> c
>> >>>>>>> 1
>> >>>>>>> 7
>> >>>>>>> 8
>> >>>>>>> decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414373211986288&sdata=
>> >> Jb7%2FW8rthM4HeMiHnsQLtTu%2B
>> >>>>>>> U
>> >>>>>>> t
>> >>>>>>> f
>> >>>>>>> l
>> >>>>>>> EL8g4B1Tw%2BkLrxw%3D&reserved=0
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Piotr Zarzycki
>> >
>> > mobile: +48 880 859 557
>> > skype: zarzycki10
>> >
>> > LinkedIn:
>>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linke
>>din.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cacc270f8127d49db794408d4fff961d
>>9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414893956825588&sdata=m
>>kPQ8Ry9xSap37GUzB%2BvmR2EqXyDGPAFPFcDCoPKZe0%3D&reserved=0
>> >
>><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpl.link
>>edin.com%2Fin%2Fpiotr-zarzycki-92a53552&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cacc270f8127d49d
>>b794408d4fff961d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6364148939
>>56825588&sdata=Q3Hkrg9yqHXyFL5viNwjc5q6b2Z1tuyAxfdPeMqH6Xo%3D&reserved=0>
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>
><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.codeo
>scopic.com&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cacc270f8127d49db794408d4fff961d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b
>34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414893956825588&sdata=3MisyBrPKGqZ7z4i
>QVxDpOMznv9gUoDFhSeYtVm26Xs%3D&reserved=0>
>
>Carlos Rovira
>
>Director General
>
>M: +34 607 22 60 05
>
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.codeos
>copic.com&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cacc270f8127d49db794408d4fff961d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b3
>4438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414893956825588&sdata=3MisyBrPKGqZ7z4iQ
>VxDpOMznv9gUoDFhSeYtVm26Xs%3D&reserved=0
>
>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.avant2
>.es&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cacc270f8127d49db794408d4fff961d9%7Cfa7b1b5a7b3443879
>4aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414893956825588&sdata=JjRskfAvu4rheYg8hO2abpm
>yhf9ZktDSMpW%2F6vHTxUo%3D&reserved=0
>
>
>Conocenos en 1 minuto!
><https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be
>%2FP2IEAYDG5HU&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cacc270f8127d49db794408d4fff961d9%7Cfa7b1b
>5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636414893956825588&sdata=LI9sNMGAL%2F
>sODdrsZrdFpBfud5V3vRJSGFvXwRQ7olU%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
>información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
>error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
>proceda a su destrucción.
>
>De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le
>comunicamos
>que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
>S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
>servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
>rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a
>nuestras
>oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
>necesaria.