[LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

Alex Harui-2
Let's try it this way.  I've changed the subject to [LAZY], which means that someone has to object in the next 72 hours or we'll say we have consensus and will enter the INFRA ticket to have the migration done ASAP.

I can't think of any reason a migration next week would be disruptive.  We're not in the middle of a release or lots of changes.  Maybe we won't even change the website until someone complains just to see if anyone actually goes to those pages.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 1/4/19, 2:37 AM, "Olaf Krueger" <[hidden email]> wrote:

    Hi Carlos,
    yes, the migration is mandatory.
    They will do the migration after February 7th without any warnings.
   
    But my understanding is, that they asked the communities to do it before
    this deadline orderly in order to avoid as much trouble as possible.
    Without any feedback from the communities, they won't migrate before
    February 7th.
   
    Of course, we could wait until February 7th, but the danger is that INFRA
    could be very busy then with fixing whatever other issues from other
    communities.
   
    If we want to let them do the migration earlier, we need to get a consensus
    about this and we need to inform INFRA.
    To get a consensus I thought a simple vote is a proper way.
   
    Makes sense? ...of course, I could be wrong ;-)
   
    Thanks,
    Olaf
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
    --
    Sent from: https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C96d88c9ee0824a32af2008d67230968a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636821950380188562&amp;sdata=3OPprtGJwMSrQuuFT7PRpHN5Axa22APX4q%2BwA%2FJfdYY%3D&amp;reserved=0
   

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

piotrz
No objections from me. I think we can let them know that they can start!

Piotr

On Fri, Jan 4, 2019, 6:42 PM Alex Harui <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Let's try it this way.  I've changed the subject to [LAZY], which means
> that someone has to object in the next 72 hours or we'll say we have
> consensus and will enter the INFRA ticket to have the migration done ASAP.
>
> I can't think of any reason a migration next week would be disruptive.
> We're not in the middle of a release or lots of changes.  Maybe we won't
> even change the website until someone complains just to see if anyone
> actually goes to those pages.
>
> My 2 cents,
> -Alex
>
> On 1/4/19, 2:37 AM, "Olaf Krueger" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>     Hi Carlos,
>     yes, the migration is mandatory.
>     They will do the migration after February 7th without any warnings.
>
>     But my understanding is, that they asked the communities to do it
> before
>     this deadline orderly in order to avoid as much trouble as possible.
>     Without any feedback from the communities, they won't migrate before
>     February 7th.
>
>     Of course, we could wait until February 7th, but the danger is that
> INFRA
>     could be very busy then with fixing whatever other issues from other
>     communities.
>
>     If we want to let them do the migration earlier, we need to get a
> consensus
>     about this and we need to inform INFRA.
>     To get a consensus I thought a simple vote is a proper way.
>
>     Makes sense? ...of course, I could be wrong ;-)
>
>     Thanks,
>     Olaf
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     --
>     Sent from:
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C96d88c9ee0824a32af2008d67230968a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636821950380188562&amp;sdata=3OPprtGJwMSrQuuFT7PRpHN5Axa22APX4q%2BwA%2FJfdYY%3D&amp;reserved=0
>
>
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

Carlos Rovira-3
I think is ok too. the sooner the better
thank! :)

PS:About website, maybe Nick is aware of this so he can make the changes as
usual?

El sáb., 5 ene. 2019 a las 11:09, Piotr Zarzycki (<[hidden email]>)
escribió:

> No objections from me. I think we can let them know that they can start!
>
> Piotr
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019, 6:42 PM Alex Harui <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > Let's try it this way.  I've changed the subject to [LAZY], which means
> > that someone has to object in the next 72 hours or we'll say we have
> > consensus and will enter the INFRA ticket to have the migration done
> ASAP.
> >
> > I can't think of any reason a migration next week would be disruptive.
> > We're not in the middle of a release or lots of changes.  Maybe we won't
> > even change the website until someone complains just to see if anyone
> > actually goes to those pages.
> >
> > My 2 cents,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 1/4/19, 2:37 AM, "Olaf Krueger" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Carlos,
> >     yes, the migration is mandatory.
> >     They will do the migration after February 7th without any warnings.
> >
> >     But my understanding is, that they asked the communities to do it
> > before
> >     this deadline orderly in order to avoid as much trouble as possible.
> >     Without any feedback from the communities, they won't migrate before
> >     February 7th.
> >
> >     Of course, we could wait until February 7th, but the danger is that
> > INFRA
> >     could be very busy then with fixing whatever other issues from other
> >     communities.
> >
> >     If we want to let them do the migration earlier, we need to get a
> > consensus
> >     about this and we need to inform INFRA.
> >     To get a consensus I thought a simple vote is a proper way.
> >
> >     Makes sense? ...of course, I could be wrong ;-)
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >     Olaf
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     --
> >     Sent from:
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C96d88c9ee0824a32af2008d67230968a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636821950380188562&amp;sdata=3OPprtGJwMSrQuuFT7PRpHN5Axa22APX4q%2BwA%2FJfdYY%3D&amp;reserved=0
> >
> >
> >
>


--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

Olaf Krueger
In reply to this post by Alex Harui-2
Since nobody has objections I've created the Jira for INFRA:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17574

Olaf



--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

piotrz
It looks like they have started doing something cause I was added to gitbox
Flex repository as a committeer :)

On Mon, Jan 7, 2019, 8:31 PM Olaf Krueger <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Since nobody has objections I've created the Jira for INFRA:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17574
>
> Olaf
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

Olaf Krueger
> It looks like they have started doing something

Yes, seems to be done ;-)



--
Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [LAZY] Mandatory migration of git repositories to gitbox.apache.org

Carlos Rovira-3
I was notified too that I was added :)



El mar., 8 ene. 2019 a las 10:11, Olaf Krueger (<[hidden email]>)
escribió:

> > It looks like they have started doing something
>
> Yes, seems to be done ;-)
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/
>


--
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira